I recommend watching Kevin Driedger‘s online presentation “Socially Networked Preservation”. In fact, you can watch it while your frozen pizza is cooking in the oven – by the time it’s all nice and hot and crispy, you’ll have learned all about the brave new frontier of conservators using Web 2.0 technology. I think it pairs well with DiGiorno’s garlic bread pepperoni pizza.
I have since returned from AIC in a sunny but chilly LA, to a decidedly cool and rainy Chicago. Apparently word is that it got up to 80 something in Chicago while I was gone and was generally gorgeous.
Anyway, just a brief note to mention that Dan Cull has put up a coherent summary of all the Web 2.0 madness that took place under everyone’s noses.
Just heard Adam Novak’s interesting talk about using digital surrogates as loss compensation in the print “Siege of La Rochelle” at the National Gallery of Art.
When to use digital surrogates instead of inpainting by hand:
*can make large time commitment
*area of loss is too large to reproduce by hand
*have access to a copy of same print
Sadly, he chose to use the magic wand tool instead of the much more accurate and powerful “Select Color Range” tool.
I appreciated that he showed each step of his image-altering and print-setup process. Also, he used 4 separate images of the same replacement print to create a “best fit” montage. On top of that, he also had to choose the right kind of paper to match the original print itself. I know from personal experience that this can be a royal pain in the tuchis. And then Golden acrylics came out with a Digital Ground for preparing materials to accept inkjet inks. Which unfortunately is soluble in water, but Golden is working on make a less-soluble version of their Digital Ground.
In the end, though, Novak created a more than acceptable surrogate without the use of the Digital Ground.
A big nitpick I must make: why is there such terrible wifi connectivity in the conference room? Conservation 2.0: internet not included.
see more Fail Blog
…but I’m liveblogging it anyway!
Best talk thus far has been Joyce Stoner’s “Conservation 1.0” which was really like “All you wanted to know about the history of art conservation but were afraid to ask…in 20 minutes”. Of course the finer points of what was and wasn’t included can be argued about ad nauseum, but it was informative nonetheless. Would make a great video if it were remixed ala Battlestar Galactica’s 8-minute recap video “What the Frak?”
Finally met Richard McCoy, a la “Hi, we’ve never met but I know you from the internet!” Maybe there should be “blogger” ribbons for next year’s AIC, like they have at ALA. OR we could all wear funny hats with large ostrich feathers to pick each other out of the crowd.
Still thinking about whether or not the Web 2.0 communication style is “in our DNA” (per Richard) like it is for librarian-types and museum folk. Conservators seem to not be as quick to embrace this sort of open-source, collaborative, information-explosion type of communication…but there are many exceptions regardless.